Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

October 2, 2023 | Susan Napier-Sewell

IOGP Lesson Sharing: Gas in Riser Incident

gas in riser

Gas in riser incident: An influx circulated up into the riser despite a flow check observed stable.

A gas in riser incident occurred during while drilling a 17 ½ section on a subsea well — a significant increase in background gas was observed. After a flow check, which was observed stable, it was decided to circulate the well. Background gas staying high. After an hour of circulation, some mud and gas were overflowing at the rig floor bushing & shakers due to gas break out in the riser. The well was shut-in and the riser had to be circulated. Mud Weight was later increased with a driller’s method.

This gas in riser lesson sharing reminds us of the difficulties in interpreting a flow check when formation gas can be dissolved in Synthetic Based Mud at the bottom.

The monitoring of the fluid primary barrier should also include some clear gas management criteria such as maximum acceptable Back Ground Gas and Connection Gas. This is of a prime importance in order to prevent any “gas in riser” incident.

What happened?

While drilling a 17-1/2″ section with 1.26 SBM, stand on bottom reaching 2468mMD, observed BGG increasing from 1-2% to 30%. Stopped circulation and performed flow-check. The well was stable.

Resumed circulation at drilling flow rate for 1h40. Observed gas was remaining >25% (peak at 37%), SPP was reducing but there was no gain or flow-out increase.

After 1h circulation, observed gas expansion below the rotary table with mud rising at the bushing, overflow at the gumbo box and the methane sensor triggered in the shaker room.

Shut in the well on UAP, started monitoring pressures while circulating the riser. Increased the booster progressively up to 1700lpm to manage gas break out. Observed gas reducing down to 10%, volume stable.

SICP increased to 60psi in 30min and then reached 150psi in 2.5hr. Performed drillers method with 1.31 sg kill mud.

Displaced riser to 1.31 sg mud and resumed drilling.

What went wrong?

  • Appraisal well – geological uncertainties.
  • Difficulties in detecting increase in volume returns – only gas shows.

Corrective actions and recommendations

Transfer and capture experience for new wells in area.

Content source: IOGP (International Organization of Oil and Gas Producers), “An influx circulated up into the riser despite a flow check,” IOGP WCI Lesson Sharing 23-9.

Categories
Accident, Investigations
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *