Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

September 1, 2007 | Ken Reed

Maglev Crash Operator “Just Forgot”

In September of last year, a German Maglev train crashed into a maintenance vehicle at 170 kph.  23 people were killed, and the system is still shut down.

According to this link, a control room operator is being charged in the incident with manslaughter through culpable negligence.  In this brief article, it says that the operator had “simply forgotten” that the maintenance vehicle was still on the track.

Without access to the full report, you have to wonder what else came out of the investigation.  Any system as complex and potentially dangerous as this would be assumed to have multiple safeguards in place to prevent this type of accident.

  • Are there visible and audible warnings on the control panel?
  • Since the system can see train positions on the tracks, are there automatic interlocks in place?
  • How did the maintenance crew document their use of the track?
  • How is a “maintenance vehicle” annotated on the panel?
  • Who approves the opening and closing of track segments for maintenance?

If the major safeguard in place is “operator must remember that the track is not clear,” it is not surprising that the accident occurred.  Hopefully, the full results of the investigation will contain more than just “discipline the employee.”

Categories
Root Cause Analysis
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *