Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

January 25, 2008 | Mark Paradies

UK National Health System Admits Error – Patient Given Kidney of Wrong Blood Type – Root Cause: “Human Error”

A story in The Mail on Sunday, a UK paper, said:

Elizabeth Ward of the British Kidney Patients Association said: “I’m quite sure it’s the first time this has happened in this country. It’s hard to understand how this could have happened.”

What was she talking about? A kidney transplant patient was forced to have the new organ removed after just a few hours – when it was discovered that the patient’s blood type had been incorrectly recorded on a computer database.

The incident, which was only revealed in response to a Freedom of Information request, comes just days after Gordon Brown called for a system in which individuals are presumed to consent to the use of their organs for transplant unless they specifically stipulate otherwise.

The error took place three years ago and would have remained secret had The Mail on Sunday not seen a confidential report into the “profound error.”

The internal investigation did not name the hospital involved. The report concluded that the initial data entry mistake was “human error” but said “there was no means of identifying” who did it or where the incorrect information had been entered.

Although the mistake was made by Hospital Trust staff, the report blamed UK Transplant for failing to set up a standard nationwide system for entering patient details. It said: “During this investigation, it became apparent that any number of professionals could have entered the blood results onto the computer.

“UK Transplant does not have a uniform system in place. [They] have not been prescriptive in dictating practice, and have allowed local Trusts the freedom to adopt whatever systems they deem fit.”

But a spokeswoman for UK Transplant said the report was “misleading” as the organization had no responsibility for how Trusts entered the information. “We need to be clear that the mistake here was not with UK Transplant,” she said.

“Information that Trusts provide is what goes into the national database. In this case, we have correctly recorded incorrect data. Our system has been in place for several years and can be viewed by Trusts at any time to check the data we hold.”

Once again, BLAME (rather than a fix for the problem) seems to be a major issue.

A source at UK Transplant said the mistake was “extremely rare” as fewer than five of the 20,000 organ transplants in the past seven years were made in error.

Hmmm … 5 in the past seven years? That sounds like more than “This has never happened before.” And if the reports aren’t made public, how can this error rate be verified?

For the complete article, see:

https://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=509289&in_page_id=1770

Categories
Root Cause Analysis
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *