Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

July 29, 2022 | Barb Carr

Is the Root Cause: “Lack of Equipment Strategy”?

equipment strategy

We received a great question from one of our clients about equipment strategy.

The Question:

“We have found a few cases where lack of an appropriate equipment strategy is the ‘root cause’ of a failure. For example, the machine has not been given the correct criticality rating so that it receives the right level of preventive maintenance, servicing, etc. Or the preventive maintenance regime is not sufficient to keep it running well. It was not given the right level of PM at the start.

Where do you think this fits in the TapRooT® Root Cause Tree structure? I have a particular interest in this as:

  • it is regularly surfacing as a finding in investigations and
  • it is an area we can influence in our reliability programs for plant equipment.”

Mark Paradies’ Answer about “Lack of Equipment Strategy” as the Root Cause of a Failure:

I see this as an Equipment Difficulty issue . . .

I took out my Root Cause Tree® Dictionary and on page 19, it asks:

Should a reasonable Preventive or Predictive Maintenance (PM) program have prevented the equipment, software difficulty or malfunction?

The client said:

We have found a few cases where the lack of an appropriate equipment strategy is the “root cause” of a failure. For example, the machine has not been given the correct criticality rating so that it receives the right level of preventive maintenance, servicing, etc. Or the preventive maintenance regime is not sufficient to keep it running well. It was not given the right level of PM at the start.

That information provides the evidence to say “yes” to that question. That means it is an Equipment Difficulty – Preventive/Predictive Maintenance issue . . .

NEXT

On page 20 it asks: “Was the failure caused by an inadequate PM/RCM/RBI Program?”

The client’s info:

We have found a few cases where the lack of an appropriate equipment strategy is the “root cause” of a failure. For example, the machine has not been given the correct criticality rating so that it receives the right level of preventive maintenance, servicing etc. Or the preventive maintenance regime is not sufficient to keep it running well. It was not given the right level of PM at the start.

provides the evidence to say “yes” to that question. That means it is an Equipment Difficulty – Preventive/Predictive Maintenance – PM NI issue . . .

NEXT

The client provided this info:

We have found a few cases where the lack of an appropriate equipment strategy is the “root cause” of a failure. For example, the machine has not been given the correct criticality rating so that it receives the right level of preventive maintenance, servicing etc.

On page 21 you would answer “yes” to:

Should there have been PM for the particular equipment/component that failed or software/code that malfunctioned?

That would make this a Equipment Difficulty – Preventive/Predictive Maintenance – PM NI – No PM for Equip issue.

Note that this is one level above a root cause. Therefore you could make a note in the comments field of the TapRooT® Software on the “No PM for Equip” box that would say:

Root Cause of failure to have PM is: “lack of an appropriate equipment strategy – wrong criticality rating given to equipment”

For the other case:

Or the preventive maintenance regime is not sufficient to keep it running well. It was not given the right level of PM at the start.

This would give us a “yes” to the question on page 22:

Was PM/RBI being performed, but was a better PM/RBI available and not being used when it should have been used?

That makes that problem a Equipment Difficulty – Preventive/Predictive Maintenance – PM NI – PM for Equip NI issue.

Once again, note that this is one level above a root cause. Therefore, you could make a note in the comments field of the TapRooT® Software on the “No PM for Equip” box that would say:

Root Cause of failure to have PM is: “lack of an appropriate equipment strategy – wrong criticality rating given to equipment – insufficient PM scheduled from the start.”

Hope this kind of guidance helps! Learn more about equipment troubleshooting on our Equifactor® Equipment Troubleshooting page.

Categories
Equipment Reliability / Equifactor®
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *