Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

March 28, 2025 | Jacob Ward

Friday Jokes

TapRooT® Friday Jokes

Friday Jokes are memes, videos, and anything funny! Tune in every week for another joke that may (or may not) relate to root cause analysis.

03/28/2025

Does the mere thought of increased spending make your executive team quiver? 😨

Budgeting can be a constant game of tug-of-war between executives and program leaders. If you want to make a persuasive argument to increase (or maintain) your budget consider the following:

📈 Gather and Present the Facts
A strong proposal will support your claims with the numbers. Your program should collect regular reports in case you need to present its impact down the pipeline.

🗣️ Preach for Realistic Risk Assessment
While tossing a safety or quality program would technically save money in the short term, this decision would likely increase unexpected costs. Robust programs protect against pricey incidents, accidents, and failures.

📄 Use Qualitative Data
Operators have valuable insights to share. Be sure to ask and include the thoughts and experiences of front-line workers in your proposal.

03/21/2025

👀 Why do shortcuts seem so attractive to workers? 👀

Your team has taken many steps to ensure protocol compliance:
• There’s been training and retraining of safety procedures.
• Stronger human engineering has been adopted.
• Leadership is more strictly enforcing the procedures.

Even after all these corrective actions, workers still want to take “the easy route.” Why?

It’s not a matter of weeding out bad apples on the team but understanding the psychology behind decision-making:

🙄 The Illusion of Safety in Familiarity

• Repetitive tasks feel safe because they’ve been done hundreds of times without an issue.
• Employees may underestimate risks because they’ve never personally experienced an accident.

😰 Social and Time Pressures

• When everyone else is working fast, employees don’t want to slow everyone else down.
• A workplace or industry culture that highly values toughness or productivity may undermine the importance of safety.
• Strict quotas will have operators and supervisors rushing through tasks and not fully evaluating risks.

🧠 Cognitive Biases

• Optimism bias is the assumption that something bad won’t happen.
• Normalcy bias is the belief that because something hasn’t happened before, it won’t happen in the future.

With these factors in mind, we can consider more effective corrective actions:
✔️ Simulation training is a safe, low-stakes way to remind workers of the risks behind shortcuts.
✔️ Reconstructing work culture is a long process that starts with dedication and involvement from the leadership team.
✔️ Communicating our natural biases may help workers catch themselves making unsafe decisions.

03/14/2025

Some companies boast a “0 Accidents” safety standard, but we say this slogan is counterproductive for many reasons:

🤞 Dishonest Reporting
If an accident does occur, workers may feel discouraged from reporting it. They might not want to ruin the company’s reputation or fear repercussions from the high standards.

😥 Near Misses
Near misses and other precursor incidents are technically not accidents, but that doesn’t make them any less important. Potential serious injuries or fatalities (PSIFs) indicate several failing or absent safeguards.

🗜️ Pressured Workers
A “zero accidents” goal may pressure workers and supervisors to achieve perfection, which is unrealistic in complex work environments. This pressure can lead to stress and burnout.

03/07/2025

Is management over-explaining what workers already know? 😐

Training objectives can be tricky to balance. If management spends too much time on easy concepts, they waste time and frustrate everyone. If they assume something important is common sense, someone will eventually mess it up.

How can teams avoid over-explaining and under-explaining learning outcomes? 🤔

🎓 Individualized Training

More experienced hires might not need to sit through basic training. An adaptive training program can save resources and avoid redundancy.

Simulation training, for example, tests workers’ skillsets in a risk-free environment. Experienced workers will quickly breeze through these sessions, while new hires can take their time to fully understand the material.

🗣️ Offering Opportunities for Feedback

Management can’t definitively know what needs more or less elaboration without the trainees’ input. Employees should be repeatedly given the chance to provide feedback, especially after a training session.

Furthermore, 2-way communication helps workers feel valued. They’re not just there to get a job done but to provide their thoughts, opinions, and insights.

🔍 Investigating Mistakes Closely

If something as simple as wearing PPE is being re-explained to the whole team, there’s a good chance someone was recently caught without it.

While retraining or reiterating its importance seems like a logical corrective action, re-explaining doesn’t really address the root causes. With further investigation, management might find the mistake wasn’t only related to training or communication — perhaps management styles, work culture, procedures, or even human engineering.

02/28/2025

Let’s talk about this work meme… 🔨

In the wrong circumstances, equipment can be a major stressor. If there are repercussions for innocent mistakes, operators may feel the need to hide any slip-ups.

How can we avoid situations like this?

😇 Rewarding Honesty

No one wants to take the blame for breaking something. We can’t expect workers to come clean if they’ll be disciplined for it.

Reporting broken equipment can be incentivized with anonymity or impunity. Set a common goal to maintain a safe and operational workplace.

🔍 Investigating Thoroughly

Even if the cause of equipment failure is related to human error, don’t be so quick to reprimand those involved. Are there any contributing systematic failures?

Could better procedural, training, communication, management, or human engineering systems have prevented this incident?

🔧 Troubleshooting Equipment

Workers don’t have to worry about breaking equipment with effective preventative maintenance. A robust troubleshooter helps teams better understand equipment difficulties and provides guidance to address those issues.

Equifactor® Equipment Troubleshooting is our framework to find and fix the root causes of equipment failures.

02/21/2025

Should workers comply with the procedures or listen to their supervisors?

Trick question. It’s the illusion of free choice. Workers are stitched up when company policies clash with management’s instructions. If something goes wrong, operators take the blame for failing to comply with one or the other.

How can we avoid this trap?

Everyone on the team can play a part in improvement, even if it’s small:

🔨 Operators

Bring any inconsistencies to the attention of your management, safety, or executive team. Never take a shortcut for the sake of saving time; it’s not worth your safety!

📋 Supervisors

Regularly check the procedures to ensure your enforcement is fair. If you notice any discrepancies, point them out to the safety or executive team.

🔍 Investigators / Safety Specialists

Perform regular, detailed audits to ensure instructions are consistently enforced. In cases of disobedience, be sure to listen to everyone’s full story—you may reveal layers of communication issues.

🔑 Executives

Ensure that all workers, operators especially, have plenty of opportunities to provide feedback and concerns. An open communication system can quickly and effectively squash any confusion.

02/14/2025

Who would win: a safety professional with years of experience, or…

📄📄📄 the mountains of paperwork to do? 📄📄📄

Paperwork can be a real headache, from incident reports to audits to everything else. Just keeping track of what needs to be filed can be a challenge, let alone the formatting and writing processes.

What are some best practices for managing paperwork?

Housekeeping ✉️

• Organizing your documents on a frequent basis will avoid the headache of losing something important. Take some time to reorganize your files and remove what’s not needed.

Digitizing 🖥️

• When appropriate, digitizing paper documents can clear up lots of space. Searching for virtual documents is also faster than physical ones.

Standardizing 📐

• A consistent format will facilitate a smoother writing process. Additionally, a standard template is easier to access and read for everyone on the team.

Reallocating 🤝

• If paperwork is taking too much time from supervisors or safety specialists, your team should consider sharing this responsibility with other members. Team leaders, for example, can support filing and documenting.

Of course, these suggestions are easier said than done. They’ll likely require the involvement of the executive team.

If your team needs some help with that, we’ll happily oblige. TapRooT® RCA helps teams spark improvement.

TapRooT® Software includes a built-in report builder, too. We include templates to get you started, but you’re welcome to upload and use your own custom reports, too!

02/07/2025

Why does reviewing job responsibilities feel like pulling teeth? 😠

Many management systems struggle with procedural violations, leading to issues with safety, quality, performance, and so on.

It’s a frustratingly simple problem. What’s so hard about following directions?

These are some of the answers you can expect to hear from workers:
• “I misunderstood.”
• “I was doing what everyone else was doing.”
• “I can’t work this quickly.”
• “I didn’t know.”

These might sound like excuses, but these responses are actually vital to tackling procedural violations. Let’s look at each justification more closely:

“I misunderstood.” 😕
• Sometimes, the issue isn’t a lack of willingness but a lack of clarity. Are the procedures all consistent and accessible from training, word-of-mouth, guidelines, and management?

“I was doing what everyone else was doing.” 🚶🚶
• Even if the procedures are perfectly clear, their relevance to the bigger picture may not be. Enforcement shouldn’t aim to punish mistakes but to educate and reward compliance.

“I can’t work this quickly.” 🏃
• Employees may feel pressured by strict quotas or managers. Their performance may slip from the constant stress, or they may resort to taking shortcuts.

“I didn’t know.” 🤷
• If employees are repeatedly giving this reply, there are quite a few systems that need further investigation, such as communication, human engineering, management, training, et cetera.

Instead of assuming workers are insubordinate, take their feedback at face value. Their experiences can be invaluable in identifying areas for improvement.

What do you think? Is “I don’t know” an excuse or an insight? Comment at the bottom of the page!

01/31/2025

Has a simple incident investigation ever turned into a surprisingly complex challenge?

Why does this happen?

When small incidents are left unchecked, they can snowball into larger issues. To give a few examples:

  • A minor safety incident could reveal layers of failed safeguards that all need further investigation.
  • Repeated equipment failure could shine a light on improper training, inadequate procedures, faulty hardware, and so on.
  • A simple human performance issue could require reevaluating communication, management, work culture, recruitment, human engineering, and other systems.

So, what can we do about this?

🏃 Stay a few steps ahead:

Performing and analyzing routine audits helps us avoid surprises. Regularly benchmark your systems to catch faulty safeguards before they fail.

🛑 Look out for warning signs:

Small mishaps are sometimes symptoms of more pressing matters. Never assume two similar incidents are happenstance before a thorough investigation.

⌛ Prepare for the worst:

As much as we would love every investigation to be a quick and easy feat, we can’t always bank on that. Be prepared to invest plenty of time and resources into seemingly minor incidents.

01/24/2025

Mom: No, we have Root Cause Analysis (RCA) at home.

RCA at home:

Hearing the same lackluster root causes?
• Human Error
• Equipment Failure
• Unknown

Enduring the same corrective actions?
• Training and Retraining
• Warning Signs on top of Warning Signs
• Extended Guidelines or Procedures

When corrective actions are based on assumptions, jumped conclusions, and guesswork, your team might as well use a Spin-A-Cause™ Wheel. 🙄

Don’t settle for knockoffs or novelties. Work with a team that’s been solving problems for decades.

Categories
Jokes
-->
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *